Independent security testing
Manual security testing for web applications, APIs, AI systems, mobile apps, networks and cloud. A small named team, every credential independently verifiable, and a report written to survive the audit that follows it.
We reply personally within 24 hours.
Most firms sell you a senior consultant and deliver a graduate with a scanner licence. Here the testers are named on this site with credentials you can check yourself, you are told who is assigned before the engagement begins, and no report leaves without a second tester reviewing it.
What we test
Manual testing of an authenticated web application against the OWASP ASVS, looking for the logic and access-control flaws that scanners do not find.
From ₹45,000
Security testing for applications built on large language models — the chat interface, the RAG pipeline, and the tools the model is allowed to call. Mapped to the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications.
From ₹60,000
REST and GraphQL testing against the OWASP API Top 10, with particular attention to object-level authorisation — the flaw class that most often survives a web app test.
From ₹40,000
Android or iOS testing against the OWASP MASVS, covering the client binary, local storage and the backend it talks to. Priced per platform.
From ₹50,000 per platform
Everything you expose to the internet, enumerated and tested — including the assets you had forgotten were there.
From ₹55,000
An assumed-breach assessment of everything reachable from inside your network: Active Directory, shared resources, infrastructure, and the estate that rarely gets tested — cameras, door controllers, printers and management interfaces.
From ₹1,50,000
AWS, Azure or GCP configuration reviewed against the provider benchmark and against how the environment is actually used.
Scoped per engagement
Manual review of the source, following the data from entry point to sink. Finds the classes of flaw that black-box testing structurally cannot reach.
Scoped per engagement
The deliverable
The gap between a real assessment and a rebadged scan shows up in the report, not in the sales call.
Executive summary
Business impact in plain language, written to be read by someone who is not an engineer.
CVSS-scored findings
Every finding with a vector, reproduction steps and captured evidence — not a scanner ID and a severity label.
Prioritised remediation roadmap
Ordered by real risk and by effort to fix, so the first week of work is the right week of work.
Technical annexure
Everything tested, including what came back clean. Coverage you can show an auditor.
Retest and closure letter
Signed confirmation of what was fixed and verified, on letterhead.
Named, with credentials you can verify independently. You will know before the engagement starts exactly who is testing your systems.
Sameer
Founder & Security Tester
Web applications · APIs · Network penetration testing
Tara
Legal & Compliance Lead
Compliance and audit readiness · ISO 27001 and SOC 2 · DPDP and data protection
Sarah
Security Consultant
Web applications · AWS cloud security · Network penetration testing
Saanvi
Security Consultant
Azure cloud security · Web applications · Network penetration testing
News & insights
Company news
A dedicated engagement for applications built on large language models — the interface, the retrieval pipeline, and the tools the model is permitted to call.
Read →Analysis
The 2025 edition added system prompt leakage and vector and embedding weaknesses, and substantially expanded excessive agency. The shift is from what a model says to what it can be made to do.
Read →Send the scope — the application, the environment, what triggered the requirement. You get a written scope and a fixed price back, not a discovery call you have to sit through first.